Ep. 174 Double Standards on the Capitol Storming and Explaining the Viking Guy
Bob offers his thoughts on the double standards in the media and pundit treatment of the Jan. 6 Capitol events. He also explains the seemingly crazy allegations from the protestor who was dressed as a Viking.
Mentioned in the Episode and Other Links of Interest:
- The Federalist article on leftist hypocrisy regarding violent protests.
- Story on activists flooding Capitol during Kavanaugh hearings.
- Bob’s (controversial) tweet about why Jan. 6 was tragic.
- Story on the Black Panthers storming the CA state Capitol.
- Video of the QAnon Shaman (i.e. Viking guy).
- Is our money based on debt?
- History channel story about underground government bunkers.
- The NYT story on Navy pilots seeing unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP).
- Help support the Bob Murphy Show.
The audio production for this episode was provided by Podsworth Media.
I dot not think Bob quoted the most potentially inflammatory part of Trump speech.
He also said:
‘When you catch somebody in a fraud, you are allowed to go by very different rules’
and
‘you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”’
On its own his words are not a smoking gun, but in context , given the situation emerging since election night and the mood in the crowd on Wednesday (as described by eye witnesses) I find it hard to believe Trump was not deliberately aiming to encourage his supporters to undertake violent protest.
neo confederate!
You talked about a disconnect in rhetoric among trump’s defenders here, but I would like to tell you it is possible to hold both the view that Trump didn’t order the psuedocoup and that his denouncement was horrible treacherous. If a friend of mine tries to overpower and kill a person who was presently attacking me and fails, and walks away with several cuts and a bullet wound, you can see how I may not have ordered it but it would be traitorous and degenerate to publicly denounce it and burn that bridge, even granting that my friend’s plan would require a gross overuse of force compared to what would be sufficient.